Claims Under Review
Popular claims about money, monetary history, and Bitcoin, tested against primary records and against the strongest account that disagrees.
Last checked ·
The claims2
Most recently checked first.
- True, imprecisely statedBitcoin protocol
“Bitcoin's mining difficulty is in the second-longest stretch in its history without a new all-time high.”
True, with one qualification the claim does not state. Difficulty last set an all-time high of 1.5597 × 10¹⁴ at the adjustment at height 921,312, timestamped 29 October 2025, and had not exceeded it 324 days later on 19 September 2026. Measured between successive all-time highs, the only longer completed stretch caused by a decline is the 364 days from 1 August 2011 to 30 July 2012. There is, however, a longer interval still: the 360 days from the genesis block to the first adjustment on 30 December 2009, during which difficulty sat at its floor of 1 because there was not yet enough hashrate to raise it. Ranking the current stretch second therefore requires excluding that period, which is defensible — it was a starting condition, not a decline — but it is an exclusion and it is unstated. The current stretch passes the 1 August 2011 record on 28 October 2026 and completes a full year on 29 October 2026.
3 sources · checked
- True, imprecisely statedMonetary history
“The Founders made debasement a capital crime.”
Section 19 of the Coinage Act of 1792 made it a felony punishable by death for an officer or person employed at the United States Mint, acting for profit or with fraudulent intent, to debase coins or embezzle metals or coins entrusted to the Mint. It did not prescribe that penalty for legislators, executive policymakers, monetary officials generally, or every act later described as currency debasement.
1 source · checked
Showing 2 of 8. Clear filters
How Claims Under Review works
- Evidence
- A claim may only be marked Verified; True, imprecisely stated; or False when at least one primary record supports that verdict. Commentary and analysis, however respected, never settle a factual claim.
- Opposing account
- A claim about monetary history or monetary theory may not reach a settled status until the strongest opposing account has been recorded, or until the search for one has been described and come back empty.
- Corrections
- A status change is recorded as a dated correction on the claim and every published piece that relied on it is re-checked.
- Scope
- Popular claims about money, monetary history, and Bitcoin, tested against primary records and against the strongest account that disagrees. This is a selected set of claims Satoshi Gazette has worked through, not a survey of everything said about money. Claims Under Review does not cover: Price forecasts and market predictions; Claims about a named private individual; Claims that rest only on commentary, with no primary record to check.
- Verdicts
- Verified
- The primary record supports the claim as commonly stated.
- True, imprecisely stated
- True, but the popular wording is imprecise enough to mislead.
- Oversimplified
- Directionally right, but materially incomplete in a way that changes what a reader concludes.
- Contested
- Credible accounts disagree on the evidence, and the disagreement is real rather than sloppy.
- Unsupported
- No primary evidence was found either way.
- False
- The primary record contradicts the claim as stated.
- Unresolved
- Satoshi Gazette has not finished the work. Recorded so the gap is visible.