Verdicts
Claims Under Review
Popular claims about money, monetary history, and Bitcoin, tested against primary records and against the strongest account that disagrees.
Last checked ·
The claims0
Most recently checked first.
No claim matches that filter. Show all 8.
Showing 0 of 8. Clear filters
How Claims Under Review works
- Evidence
- A claim may only be marked Verified; True, imprecisely stated; or False when at least one primary record supports that verdict. Commentary and analysis, however respected, never settle a factual claim.
- Opposing account
- A claim about monetary history or monetary theory may not reach a settled status until the strongest opposing account has been recorded, or until the search for one has been described and come back empty.
- Corrections
- A status change is recorded as a dated correction on the claim and every published piece that relied on it is re-checked.
- Scope
- Popular claims about money, monetary history, and Bitcoin, tested against primary records and against the strongest account that disagrees. This is a selected set of claims Satoshi Gazette has worked through, not a survey of everything said about money. Claims Under Review does not cover: Price forecasts and market predictions; Claims about a named private individual; Claims that rest only on commentary, with no primary record to check.
- Verdicts
- Verified
- The primary record supports the claim as commonly stated.
- True, imprecisely stated
- True, but the popular wording is imprecise enough to mislead.
- Oversimplified
- Directionally right, but materially incomplete in a way that changes what a reader concludes.
- Contested
- Credible accounts disagree on the evidence, and the disagreement is real rather than sloppy.
- Unsupported
- No primary evidence was found either way.
- False
- The primary record contradicts the claim as stated.
- Unresolved
- Satoshi Gazette has not finished the work. Recorded so the gap is visible.